tickrz reports
  
tickrz rank
B
ConocoPhillips (COP)
Basic Materials | Independent Oil & Gas
CEO: Ryan M. Lance
Employees: 15900
conocophillips.com
FACTOR RANKINGSFACTOR SCREENER 
Pure Value Rank95Dividend Rank324
Moat Rank423Financial Strength Rank486
Growth Rank477Momentum Rank264
DIVIDEND ANALYSIS
Dividend Yield2.14%
Payout Ratio-84.51%
3 yr Dividend Growth-28.19%
VALUATION RATIOS
P/E Ratiox
P/B Ratio1.68x
P/S Ratio2.19x
EV/EBITDA Ratio9.4x
FINANCIAL STRENGTH
Piotroski F-Score4
Debt-to-Equity74%
Interest Coverage-1.77x
MOAT
ROE-4.01%
ROIC-2.43%
Net Margin-15.13%
GROWTH
5 yr EPS Growth-179.8%
5 yr SPS Growth-17.7%
5 yr BPS Growth-11.04%
ConocoPhillips achieves a strong Pure Value rank with its low valuation multiples
 tickrz summary
ConocoPhillips receives a B ranking in our proprietary ranking system that combines valuation, moat, operational performance, and financial strength. View the Top 50 tickrz ranked stocks here.
 value
 pure value ranking Warren Buffett ranking
Valuation is the most heavily weighted component in our tickrz ranking methodology. Numerous academic and practitioner studies have found that a value approach outperforms the market over the long-run. ConocoPhillips's valuation score is comprised of a P/B ratio of 1.7x, a P/S ratio of 2.2x, and an EV/EBITDA ratio of 9.4x. ConocoPhillips ranks 95 out of the S&P 500 constituents on valuation--a relatively strong score.ConocoPhillips ranks 335 out of the S&P 500 constituents in our multi-factor Warren Buffett ranking methodology. This is a weak score, meaning it ranks poorly on valuation, moat, volatility, and financial strength factors. If you're looking for undervalued stocks with high moats and strong competitive advantages, ConocoPhillips is probably not for you.

 quality
 moat financial strength
To calculate a company's Moat Score, we look at its historical earnings growth, historical average return on equity, the volatility of its earnings stream, and also factor in the strength of its balance sheet. Our approach concludes the company's business moat is weak. Its position within the Basic Materials sector appears to be weak. Either the dynamics of its sector place it in a difficult position or management's executition is to blame for its disappointing performance.ConocoPhillips has a Piotroski F Score of 4 out of 9. The F Score examines changes in profitability, leverage, liquidity, and operating efficiency. Interest coverage of -1.77x, a debt/equity ratio of 74% and a Moat Rank of 423 translate to a weak Financial Strength score.


 momentum
Investment research has shown that stocks with strong performance over the last 6 to 12 months tend to perform better in the medium term than stocks with poor performance over the same period. In fact, the momentum factor is one of the strongest of all the investment factors. The company has seen its stock appreciate by 10.7% over the last 12 months. This performance is average compared to other stocks in the S&P 500, earning it a rank of 264. Based on its 12 month stock performance, ConocoPhillips will not appeal to momentum investors.

 yield
 value + yield
Shares currently yield 2.14%. Our dividend ranking approach looks at a company's dividend growth rate, payout ratio, business moat, and valuation. Based on our methodology, ConocoPhillips ranks 324 among the S&P 500 constituents. Investors looking for undervalued dividend stocks will probably want to look elsewhere.

 growth
A company's growth metrics are less important than its valuation, moat, and financial strength. However, a check on growth can be a good way to avoid companies in secular decline. The company's growth in sales, earnings, and book value places it among the bottom third of S&P500 companies. Its -179.8% 5 year annualized EPS growth, -17.7% 5 year annualized sales-per-share growth, and 5 year annualized book value-per-share growth of -11% speak to its relatively poor ranking.

ConocoPhillips (COP)
Basic Materials | Independent Oil & Gas
CEO: Ryan M. Lance
Employees: 15900
conocophillips.com


tickrz rank
B

VALUATION RATIOS
P/E Ratiox
P/B Ratio1.68x
P/S Ratio2.19x
EV/EBITDA Ratio9.4x
DIVIDEND ANALYSIS
Dividend Yield2.14%
Payout Ratio-84.51%
3 yr Dividend Growth-28.19%
FINANCIAL STRENGTH
Piotroski F-Score4
Debt-to-Equity74%
Interest Coverage-1.77x
MOAT
ROE-4.01%
ROIC-2.43%
Net Margin-15.13%
GROWTH
5 yr EPS Growth-179.8%
5 yr SPS Growth-17.7%
5 yr BPS Growth-11.04%

TICKRZ RANK
ConocoPhillips receives a B ranking in our proprietary ranking system that combines valuation, moat, operational performance, and financial strength. View the Top 50 tickrz ranked stocks here.

PURE VALUE
Valuation is the most heavily weighted component in our tickrz ranking methodology. Numerous academic and practitioner studies have found that a value approach outperforms the market over the long-run. ConocoPhillips's valuation score is comprised of a P/B ratio of 1.7x, a P/S ratio of 2.2x, and an EV/EBITDA ratio of 9.4x. ConocoPhillips ranks 95 out of the S&P 500 constituents on valuation--a relatively strong score.

WARREN BUFFETT RANKING
ConocoPhillips ranks 335 out of the S&P 500 constituents in our multi-factor Warren Buffett ranking methodology. This is a weak score, meaning it ranks poorly on valuation, moat, volatility, and financial strength factors. If you're looking for undervalued stocks with high moats and strong competitive advantages, ConocoPhillips is probably not for you.

MOAT
To calculate a company's Moat Score, we look at its historical earnings growth, historical average return on equity, the volatility of its earnings stream, and also factor in the strength of its balance sheet. Our approach concludes the company's business moat is weak. Its position within the Basic Materials sector appears to be weak. Either the dynamics of its sector place it in a difficult position or management's executition is to blame for its disappointing performance.

FINANCIAL STRENGTH
ConocoPhillips has a Piotroski F Score of 4 out of 9. The F Score examines changes in profitability, leverage, liquidity, and operating efficiency. Interest coverage of -1.77x, a debt/equity ratio of 74% and a Moat Rank of 423 translate to a weak Financial Strength score.

MOMENTUM
Investment research has shown that stocks with strong performance over the last 6 to 12 months tend to perform better in the medium term than stocks with poor performance over the same period. In fact, the momentum factor is one of the strongest of all the investment factors. The company has seen its stock appreciate by 10.7% over the last 12 months. This performance is average compared to other stocks in the S&P 500, earning it a rank of 264. Based on its 12 month stock performance, ConocoPhillips will not appeal to momentum investors.

VALUE + YIELD
Shares currently yield 2.14%. Our dividend ranking approach looks at a company's dividend growth rate, payout ratio, business moat, and valuation. Based on our methodology, ConocoPhillips ranks 324 among the S&P 500 constituents. Investors looking for undervalued dividend stocks will probably want to look elsewhere.

GROWTH
A company's growth metrics are less important than its valuation, moat, and financial strength. However, a check on growth can be a good way to avoid companies in secular decline. The company's growth in sales, earnings, and book value places it among the bottom third of S&P500 companies. Its -179.8% 5 year annualized EPS growth, -17.7% 5 year annualized sales-per-share growth, and 5 year annualized book value-per-share growth of -11% speak to its relatively poor ranking.