tickrz reports
tickrz rank
C
ConocoPhillips (COP)
Basic Materials | Energy
47.10  1.25%
FACTOR RANKINGSFACTOR SCREENER 
tickrz RankC / 299Warren Buffett RankD / 448
Pure Value RankB / 227Dividend RankD / 378
Moat RankD / 424Financial Strength RankD / 339
Growth RankD / 479Momentum RankC / 274
COP vs ENERGY SECTOR & S&P 500
VALUATION
COPSECTORS&P 500
P/E RATIO213.319.28
EV/EBITDA RATIO19.2217.711.77
P/S RATIO1.892.72.03
P/B RATIO1.92.13.09
QUALITY
RETURN ON EQUITY-11.33%0.91%13.82%
RETURN ON CAPITAL-7.99%0.63%10.04%
NET MARGIN-15.13%-20.13%9.76%
DIVIDEND ANALYSIS
DIVIDEND YIELD
2.25%
PAYOUT RATIO-33.29%
3 YR DIVIDEND GROWTH-28.19%
FINANCIAL STRENGTH
PIOTROSKI F SCORE
4 OUT OF 9
DEBT-TO-EQUITY77%
INTEREST COVERAGE-2.39x
CURRENT RATIO2
GROWTH
5 YR EPS GROWTH-179.8%
5 YR SPS GROWTH-17.7%
5 YR BPS GROWTH-11.04%
About tickrz
Key Concepts
Great Investors
tickrz Report
tickrz rank C / 299
ConocoPhillips receives a C ranking in our proprietary ranking system that combines valuation, moat, operational performance, and financial strength. View the Top 50 tickrz ranked stocks here.
value
pure value ranking B / 227Warren Buffett ranking D / 448
Valuation is the most heavily weighted component in our tickrz ranking methodology. Numerous academic and practitioner studies have found that a value approach outperforms the market over the long-run. ConocoPhillips's valuation score is comprised of a P/B ratio of 1.9x, a P/S ratio of 1.9x, and an EV/EBITDA ratio of 19.2x. ConocoPhillips ranks 227 out of the S&P 500 constituents on valuation--a relatively average score.ConocoPhillips ranks 448 out of the S&P 500 constituents in our multi-factor Warren Buffett ranking methodology. This is a weak score, meaning it ranks poorly on valuation, moat, volatility, and financial strength factors. If you're looking for undervalued stocks with high moats and strong competitive advantages, ConocoPhillips is probably not for you.

quality
moat D / 424financial strength D / 339
To calculate a company's Moat Score, we look at its historical earnings growth, historical average return on equity, the volatility of its earnings stream, and also factor in the strength of its balance sheet. Our approach concludes the company's business moat is weak. Its position within the Basic Materials sector appears to be weak. Either the dynamics of its sector place it in a difficult position or management's executition is to blame for its disappointing performance.ConocoPhillips has a Piotroski F Score of 4 out of 9. The F Score examines changes in profitability, leverage, liquidity, and operating efficiency. Interest coverage of -2.39x, a debt/equity ratio of 77% and a Moat Rank of 424 translate to a weak Financial Strength score.


momentum C / 274
Investment research has shown that stocks with strong performance over the last 6 to 12 months tend to perform better in the medium term than stocks with poor performance over the same period. In fact, the momentum factor is one of the strongest of all the investment factors. The company has seen its stock appreciate by 11.17% over the last 12 months. This performance is weak compared to other stocks in the S&P 500, earning it a rank of 274. Based on its 12 month stock performance, ConocoPhillips will not appeal to momentum investors.

yield D / 378
value + yield
Shares currently yield 2.25%. Our dividend ranking approach looks at a company's dividend growth rate, payout ratio, business moat, and valuation. Based on our methodology, ConocoPhillips ranks 378 among the S&P 500 constituents. Investors looking for undervalued dividend stocks will probably want to look elsewhere.

growth D / 479
A company's growth metrics are less important than its valuation, moat, and financial strength. However, a check on growth can be a good way to avoid companies in secular decline. The company's growth in sales, earnings, and book value places it among the bottom third of S&P500 companies. Its -179.8% 5 year annualized EPS growth, -17.7% 5 year annualized sales-per-share growth, and 5 year annualized book value-per-share growth of -11% speak to its relatively poor ranking.

ConocoPhillips (COP)
Basic Materials | Energy
47.10  1.25%


tickrz rank
C
VALUATION RATIOS
P/E Ratiox
P/B Ratio1.9x
P/S Ratio1.89x
EV/EBITDA Ratio19.22x
DIVIDEND ANALYSIS
DIVIDEND YIELD
2.25%
PAYOUT RATIO-33.29%
3 YR DIVIDEND GROWTH-28.19%
FINANCIAL STRENGTH
PIOTROSKI F SCORE
4 OUT OF 9
DEBT-TO-EQUITY77%
INTEREST COVERAGE-2.39x
CURRENT RATIO2
MOAT
ROE-11.33%
ROIC-7.99%
Net Margin-15.13%
GROWTH
5 YR EPS GROWTH-179.8%
5 YR SPS GROWTH-17.7%
5 YR BPS GROWTH-11.04%

TICKRZ RANK
ConocoPhillips receives a C ranking in our proprietary ranking system that combines valuation, moat, operational performance, and financial strength. View the Top 50 tickrz ranked stocks here.

PURE VALUE
Valuation is the most heavily weighted component in our tickrz ranking methodology. Numerous academic and practitioner studies have found that a value approach outperforms the market over the long-run. ConocoPhillips's valuation score is comprised of a P/B ratio of 1.9x, a P/S ratio of 1.9x, and an EV/EBITDA ratio of 19.2x. ConocoPhillips ranks 227 out of the S&P 500 constituents on valuation--a relatively average score.

WARREN BUFFETT RANKING
ConocoPhillips ranks 448 out of the S&P 500 constituents in our multi-factor Warren Buffett ranking methodology. This is a weak score, meaning it ranks poorly on valuation, moat, volatility, and financial strength factors. If you're looking for undervalued stocks with high moats and strong competitive advantages, ConocoPhillips is probably not for you.

MOAT
To calculate a company's Moat Score, we look at its historical earnings growth, historical average return on equity, the volatility of its earnings stream, and also factor in the strength of its balance sheet. Our approach concludes the company's business moat is weak. Its position within the Basic Materials sector appears to be weak. Either the dynamics of its sector place it in a difficult position or management's executition is to blame for its disappointing performance.

FINANCIAL STRENGTH
ConocoPhillips has a Piotroski F Score of 4 out of 9. The F Score examines changes in profitability, leverage, liquidity, and operating efficiency. Interest coverage of -2.39x, a debt/equity ratio of 77% and a Moat Rank of 424 translate to a weak Financial Strength score.

MOMENTUM
Investment research has shown that stocks with strong performance over the last 6 to 12 months tend to perform better in the medium term than stocks with poor performance over the same period. In fact, the momentum factor is one of the strongest of all the investment factors. The company has seen its stock appreciate by 11.17% over the last 12 months. This performance is weak compared to other stocks in the S&P 500, earning it a rank of 274. Based on its 12 month stock performance, ConocoPhillips will not appeal to momentum investors.

VALUE + YIELD
Shares currently yield 2.25%. Our dividend ranking approach looks at a company's dividend growth rate, payout ratio, business moat, and valuation. Based on our methodology, ConocoPhillips ranks 378 among the S&P 500 constituents. Investors looking for undervalued dividend stocks will probably want to look elsewhere.

GROWTH
A company's growth metrics are less important than its valuation, moat, and financial strength. However, a check on growth can be a good way to avoid companies in secular decline. The company's growth in sales, earnings, and book value places it among the bottom third of S&P500 companies. Its -179.8% 5 year annualized EPS growth, -17.7% 5 year annualized sales-per-share growth, and 5 year annualized book value-per-share growth of -11% speak to its relatively poor ranking.