Caterpillar Inc (CAT)
Industrial Goods | Farm & Construction Machinery
CEO: Donald James Umpleby
Unfortunately we don't have enough data to calculate Caterpillar Inc's tickrz rank.
Valuation is the most heavily weighted component in our tickrz ranking methodology. Numerous academic and practitioner studies have found that a value approach outperforms the market over the long-run. Caterpillar Inc's valuation score is comprised of a P/B ratio of 4.5x, a P/S ratio of 1.6x, and an EV/EBITDA ratio of 25.1x. .
WARREN BUFFETT RANKING
Caterpillar Inc ranks 459 out of the S&P 500 constituents in our multi-factor Warren Buffett ranking methodology. This is a weak score, meaning it ranks poorly on valuation, moat, volatility, and financial strength factors.
To calculate a company's Moat Score, we look at its historical earnings growth, historical average return on equity, the volatility of its earnings stream, and also factor in the strength of its balance sheet.
Caterpillar Inc has a Piotroski F Score of 3 out of 9. The F Score examines changes in profitability, leverage, liquidity, and operating efficiency. Interest coverage of 1.13x, a debt/equity ratio of 280% and a Moat Rank of 371 translate to a weak Financial Strength score.
Investment research has shown that stocks with strong performance over the last 6 to 12 months tend to perform better in the medium term than stocks with poor performance over the same period. In fact, the momentum factor is one of the strongest of all the investment factors. The company has seen its stock appreciate by 34.62% over the last 12 months. This performance is strong compared to other stocks in the S&P 500, earning it a rank of 58.
VALUE + YIELD
Shares currently yield 3.01%. Our dividend ranking approach looks at a company's dividend growth rate, payout ratio, business moat, and valuation. Based on our methodology, Caterpillar Inc ranks 388 among the S&P 500 constituents.
A company's growth metrics are less important than its valuation, moat, and financial strength. However, a check on growth can be a good way to avoid companies in secular decline. Its -143.1% 5 year annualized EPS growth, -8.5% 5 year annualized sales-per-share growth, and 5 year annualized book value-per-share growth of 2.4% speak to its relatively poor ranking.